The forum pages are fully operational! See this link for the latest forum topics, where users can collaborate or discuss certain topics in one place!

The site will be in a readonly mode from 2024-09-19 12:00 Noon EDT to allow the site to move servers.

Arthur Wiki:User Rights Requests/2012 Archive

From Arthur Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
User Rights Requests Archives

Current20112012


The content within this article is solely for archival purposes – please do not edit.

Requests for Bureaucrat[edit]

THE CJ IS BACK (successful)[edit]

I've been an administrator for several months now and I've been a user of the Arthur Wiki since late 2010. In my last year and a half being here I have edited, helped users to the best of my ability, removed spam, blocked troublesome users, and done other things for the wiki. Why I think I should be a Bureaucrat is because I'm on this wiki daily and when the other administrators aren't around due to them being busy I can always take over the role of watching the wiki. I can also give user rights to users who run for various positions that are available or needed and are supported by fellow users including administrators alike. These are my reasons for running. I'm MC CJ and I approve of this message.  IT'S ME IT'S ME IT'S MC CJ | Talk  . 03:17, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Support[edit]

  • In my current inactivity here, I endorse MC CJ for bureaucratship. :) Two active bureaucrats is a must for a wiki of any size. Annawantimes (Wall) 04:19, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • For someone this active and working, there's only one real direction to go. :) Magnezonomon 04:27, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • Luke707Talk 02:52, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

Neutral[edit]

Comments[edit]

This discussion has been ended.

THE CJ IS BACK will be given bureaucratship.


Requests for Administrator[edit]

Orion001 (unsuccessful)[edit]

Support[edit]

  • I support Orion001 as administrator.  IT'S ME IT'S ME IT'S MC CJ | Talk  . 21:30, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • In his time as a temporary admin, Orion has shown the proper ability and attitude to perform as a full-time administrator. Bzz...Bzz...MAGNEZONOMON 22:08, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • As much as I think we're covered with admins, I have no choice but to support this. In addition to making countless contributions to this wiki, Orion has responded to vandalism in a way that no one else has. I rarely have to undo vandalism because he is always able to cake tare of it so quickly. I feel that he will be a great permanent administrator for the wiki. --Muppetfan 14:38, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  • I must point out multiple reasons of why Orion001 receiving permanent admin rights would be a bad idea. Although last time I talked to Cj he stated that "Orion will not be a permanent admin", I was kindly greeted by this request just now. I must point out that Orion001 has been blocked twice from this wiki, and that his administrator rights were only meant to be temporary while CJ was on vacation. I must also add that in the past few weeks, Arthur wiki has added two additional administrators, meaning that "we're covered with admins" . Other things I've notice include that Orion tends to leave chat when confronted with simple questions (eg: "why did you make this edit?", etc.) rather then answer them like a responsible administrator would. I feel Orion also leaves inappropriate and grammatically wrong (to the point I can't understand it) warning and block messages (eg: "you are the weakest link, goodbye"). Although Orion001 has good edits (and bad, thus being blocked in the past), I feel he is not responsible enough to handle a permanent administrative position, and I also feel that users here have forgotten this user's past. I may also add that as of this message being posted, no users without sysop or chatmod rights have commented on this RfA, and I will request that this RfA not be closed until 10 votes have been submitted (with some voters not being admin). PS: I don't have any conflict history with Orion, and everything typed above is my honest opinion. Colgatecity 17:17, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral[edit]

Comments[edit]

  • Yesterday Orion and me saved the wiki from heavy vandalism (along with the help of other users that assisted us yesterday). Had you not been hear this wiki would of been completely vandalized and it would of taken me a while to fix it. Also with the decision to make the wiki a registered users only wiki things will be easier on us when it comes to vandalism.  IT'S ME IT'S ME IT'S MC CJ | Talk  . 21:29, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • While I am not against Colgatecity or his opinions, I did want to clarify a one thing said in his post: Orion's blocking was later looked into and deemed uncalled for by the admins, hence the reason we basically pretend that they never happened. --Muppetfan 19:07, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you for all the wonderful comments, even I am not a administrator I keep up the good work I do.
  • Though Orion did serve as a temporary admin, he will not be given rights on a permanent basis, due to lack of support/need. --Muppetfan (talk) 18:50, July 22, 2012 (UTC)


This discussion has been ended.

Orion001 will not be given adminship.


Orion001 (unsuccessful)[edit]

My name is Orion001 I have been on Arthur Wiki for nearly a year. I am always on the website 24/7 and constently editing, uploading pictures and adding pages. I wish to step forward and help this site some more as a Adminitrator.

Support[edit]

A Wiki Contributor: Alonessix

Oppose[edit]

Neutral[edit]

Comments[edit]

You still spelt "constantly" and "administrator" wrong. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 19:06, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion has been ended.

Orion001 will not be given adminship.

Support your position on this user's rights request.

Muppetfan (successful)[edit]

Support[edit]

  • Hello everyone, I am requesting to become an administrator of this wiki. I joined the wiki March 7, 2010, and have made 1,260 edits in that time period. For a while I took a long break from editing the wiki, but I've been back for a while now and am not planning on taking any breaks from editing anytime soon. For a while I was one of the only contributors of Arthur Wiki, and along with Noahcs and FrancineFan3833, helped expand this wiki and turn it around. I have created many many pages and uploaded many images. I would like to become an admin so that I can help fix vandalism and delete unnecessary pages. I'm very interested in expanding and fixing the wiki to make it more easily accessible to everyone, so that everyone can have unlimited Arthur knowledge. --Muppetfan 01:31, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • I support this decision because I'm the only daily admin on the wiki. Having two daily administrators would make things better around here and would allow us to address issues quicker then ever before. So Muppetfan I support this decision. :)  IT'S ME IT'S ME IT'S MC CJ | Talk  . 01:42, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • After examining potential alternatives, I think that Muppetfan shows the best administrator qualities. I also believe that s/he has experience on his/her side. Annawantimes (Wall) 04:31, April 1, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

Neutral[edit]

Comments[edit]

  • Thank you for the support, CJ! --Muppetfan 01:44, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • It's also good to see that me and Luke aren't the only users here that debuted here in 2010.  IT'S ME IT'S ME IT'S MC CJ | Talk  . 01:47, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yeah, we really accomplished a ton in 2010. We pretty much built the foundation for this wiki. I don't really remember you being here then, though. You must have joined right after I took that editing break. --Muppetfan 01:49, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • I made my first edit in December of 2010. Just eight days before I turned 19. I was here earlier in October of 2010 checking out the wiki.  IT'S ME IT'S ME IT'S MC CJ | Talk  . 01:55, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Annawantimes your just the person I'm waiting for. Okay then. Time for me to go into action.  IT'S ME IT'S ME IT'S MC CJ | Talk  . 04:36, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
This discussion has been ended.

Muppetfan will be given adminship.


Requests for Fanon Administrator[edit]

Magnezonomon (unsuccessful)[edit]

Support your position on this user's rights request.

Support[edit]

  • I have the proper knowledge of editing a wiki, respect for other people's ideas (even if I don't necessarily like them), and am on regularly enough to properly monitor and fix things as needed. Magnezonomon 02:59, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Well Magnezonomon I like where you are going with that. You have my support. :)  IT'S ME IT'S ME IT'S MC CJ | Talk  . 03:01, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • You're very hard-working and actually do a good job of editing (unlike the vandals..) and you show an interest in the Fanons. :D All in. AwkwardArthur 06:31, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

Neutral[edit]

  • Too new. LukePhiladelphiaTalk 03:07, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
    • I disagree, he has been here long enough to meet the requirements. I have been editing on Avatar Wiki (a quite larger wiki) for only 3 months, and I am being considered for adminship. :) Annawantimes (Wall) 04:15, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments[edit]

This discussion has been ended.

Magnezonomon will not be given fanon adminship.


Requests for Rollback[edit]

None