Arthur Wiki:User Rights Requests/2011 Archive

The content within this article is solely for archival purposes – please do not edit.

Requests for Bureaucrat

Annawantimes (unsuccessful)

Support your position on this user's rights request.

Support

• I am a intelligent user, particularly in the field of Arthur. I do not see myself leaving Arthur Wiki, or Wikia for that matter, anytime soon. I have a very extensive vocabularly, and I make grammatically correct edits, which also are canonical to the Arthur television and book series. I have been an Administrator on several other Wikia communities, and a Bureaucrat on one other. The general consent of Arthur Wiki users in regards to my changes to the wiki have been quite positive, a reference being the comments on this blog post. I have ample experience in Wikia markup, and in conclusion, I believe I would be the most appropriate choice for a new Arthur Wiki Bureaucrat.  Annawantimes | My Talk | Edit Count  01:11, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
• Although I am not a admin or anyone in the head of this wiki, I would support Annawantimes. He is very passionate for this wiki. Even though I also want to be a bureaucrat, I believe I would be more appropriate as an admin. I would like to reccomend Annawantimes as bureaucrat. I have edited only one other wiki, but I have watched Arthur my whole life. I really think Annawantimes and I would be very valuable to this wiki. Please allow Annawantimes to be bureaucrat and myself to be admin. Dduvall95 20:20, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Dduvall95. I will rightfully serve you in accordance with your support. Even if I am not on this wiki too much, I have several others to Administrate and edit, so I am regularly logged in to Wikia. My schedule is opening up a little, so hopefully I can help the wiki out in the upcoming months. Thanks for your support,  Annawantimes | My Talk | Edit Count  02:57, September 9, 2011 (UTC)

• Yeah, I definitely agree with Dduvall95, you would make a gret Bureaucrat. You have my support.

Buster Baxter 19:08, September 10, 2011 (UTC)Buster BaxterBuster Baxter 19:08, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

This discussion has been ended. Annawantimes will not be given bureaucratship.

Buster Baxter (unsuccessful)

Support your position on this user's rights request.

Support

• I would definitely love to become a Bureaucrat on the Arthur Wiki because I have been on this wiki for sometime now and will add and edit pages regulary and if I see anyone vandalising, I will ban them immediately. I know alot about Arthur and have watched pretty much every episode. I am currently ranked #5 on the Wiki and I believe that with the right help, we can fix the Arthur Wiki. Thanks.

Buster Baxter 15:10, September 9, 2011 (UTC)Buster BaxterBuster Baxter 15:10, September 9, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

• I must say that I am against this, sorry, Buster Baxter. Well, I am opposed because generally to become a Bureaucrat one must have some special experience like, Administrator Rights and any special user rights that most do not have.  Annawantimes | My Talk | Edit Count  14:22, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
• I am against this. I don't really see you editing lot of pages besides adding categories. lp 17:15, October 18, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

• Thank you for giving me the chance to become a bureaucrat.

This discussion has been ended. Buster Baxter will not be given bureaucratship.

Dduvall95 (unsuccessful)

Support your position on this user's rights request.

Oppose

• I must say I am in oppose of this, because, as aforementioned in the Bureaucrat requirements, Bureaucrats generally have to have been Administrators from a month. In this varianted case in which there is only one Administrator who is not a Bureaucrat, the policy is differentiated slightly. I am still in oppose.  Annawantimes | My Talk | Edit Count  01:06, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
• What can I say? lp (msg) 18:23, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
• There is no need for a Bureauccrats Orion • (Talk) 18:45, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
• I have to ask, but what does a Bureauccrat do any way?  IT'S ME IT'S ME IT'S MC CJ | Talk  . 18:58, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
• Bureaucrats can promote other users to a higher status. Administrators can't do that. Annawantimes (Talk) 21:12, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
• Also, this request is a few months old and Dduvall95 is pretty inactive lately. Annawantimes (Talk) 21:14, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

This discussion has been ended. Dduvall95 will not be given bureaucratship.

Requests for Administrator

Buster Baxter (unsuccessful)

Support your position on this user's rights request.

Support

• I would really love to be an administrator because I love Arthur and I will add and edit pages regularly while banning people who are vandalising the wiki. I will also upload photos and check that the content and info on this wiki is pure and accurate. I am currently ranked #3 on this wiki and I believe that with a few admins, we can help build the Arthur Wiki. Thank you.

Buster Baxter 15:14, September 9, 2011 (UTC)Buster BaxterBuster Baxter 15:14, September 9, 2011 (UTC)

• I will support this, because it seems you are an active user who is caring about the wiki. Great job,  Annawantimes | My Talk | Edit Count  14:24, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
• Thank you very much, Annawantimes.

Buster Baxter 18:58, September 10, 2011 (UTC)Buster BaxterBuster Baxter 18:58, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

• I'm not sure if users are confusing me with User:Buster Baxter because he does not yet have over 1,000 edits and has only been here since late August. Anyways, I'm sorry but I have to oppose this. Buster Baxter only recently joined the Arthur Wiki and I haven't seen him active on the Wiki much. It is every user's job to care about the Wiki and thank you for doing that but you really haven't been here long enough to gain the trust of me. Of course this could probably change if I saw you more active and you show me that you're responsible enough to become an admin on the Arthur Wiki. Thank you. lp 17:21, October 18, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

• Give him the rights. He's been here longer than anyone else and has over 1,000 edits.
• Dduvall95 hasn't contributed in a while and I sort alot of pages into categories.

This discussion has been ended. Buster Baxter will not be given adminship.

Dduvall95 (unsuccessful)

Support your position on this user's rights request.

Support

• Although I am not a admin or anyone in the head of this wiki, I am very smart and love Arthur. I am very passionate for this wiki. Even though I want to be a bureaucrat, I believe I would be more appropriate as an admin. I would like to reccomend Annawantimes as bureaucrat. I have edited only one other wiki, but I have watched Arthur my whole life. I really think Annawantimes and I would be very valuable to this wiki. Please allow Annawantimes to be bureaucrat and myself to be admin. Dduvall95 20:20, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
• Am am in support of this. Dduvall95 is a valid choice for an Admin. I do not see any others requesting for Administrative powers or Bureaucracy, and I believe Dduvall95 can greatly help out this wiki when I am away working on my other wikia communities. Dduvall95 for Administrator, please.  Annawantimes | My Talk | Edit Count  03:00, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
• I would support both Annawartimes and Dduvall95 with them admin. I will always support LukePhiladephia as admin. Because they are the nicest adminitrators I meet and I hope when I have enough experenice I would be an administrator like them.Orion001 21:31, September 26, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

• User:Dduvall95 is a big help to this wiki (thank you for that) but I looked at his contributions and I saw that most of them were just edits on peoples talk pages and categorizing pages. For now I think that Dduvall should stay as a user until he proves he is deserving enough to become an administrator. Thank you.lp 17:10, October 14, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

• My actions lead to the majority of vandalized pages being deleted. Dduvall95 20:04, September 14, 2011 (UTC)

This discussion has been ended. Dduvall95 will not be given adminship.

Jacksonian (successful)

Support your position on this user's rights request.

I've been working on this wiki for nearly a year, over 330 edits, not counting over 500 from before I had a username. I have also watched Arthur extensively, and strictly oppose vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacksonian (talk • contribs)

Support

• I pledge my undivided support. For one, at the pinnacle of Arthur Wiki's battle for an Administrator, Jacksonian was one of the two asked to become an Administrator (He and LukePhiladelphia, not me). I believe that if a Staff member entrusted him to be an Admin then I will do the same. Annawantimes (Talk) 23:40, November 27, 2011 (UTC)
• I also pledge my undivided support for Jacksonian to become an Administrator. THE CJ IS BACK 23:43, November 27, 2011 (UTC)
• I think that he should also become an administrator. lp (msg) 00:08, November 28, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

• Not even a half hour and three people support it. Annawantimes (Talk) 00:09, November 28, 2011 (UTC)

This discussion has been ended. Jacksonian will be given adminship.

THE CJ IS BACK (successful)

Support your position on this user's rights request.

Support

• Hello I am THE CJ IS BACK. I have liked Arthur for a long time and have been a fan of it ever since. I know I will make a good administrator for this wiki here and will be able to figure out and deal with problems that occur. I've been here ever since December 12, 2010 and combining the edits with my older account MC CJ and my current account I have done a total of more then 1400 edits with many more to come. With me as an administrator and the combined efforts of the other administrators we will be able to make this wiki a much better community then it already is. While I have never been a moderator of any website before I know I will do alright and will have the support of the other administrators.
• Great details to support this request! I see you as a great Administrator of the wiki, and I also don't see you leaving at any time in the near future. You have my support. Annawantimes (Talk) 01:30, October 24, 2011 (UTC)
• Sounds like a good idea to me. He would make a great administrator for the Arthur wiki. He regularly contributes on here and he has been here for a while so he recognizes most editors. Support from me. lp 12:25, October 24, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

• Thanks Annawantimes.THE CJ IS BACK 01:38, October 24, 2011 (UTC)
• Thanks for the support lp. THE CJ IS BACK 23:57, October 24, 2011 (UTC)
• Disscusion ended. THE CJ IS BACK has recieved adminship. lp 13:20, October 25, 2011 (UTC)

This discussion has been ended. THE CJ IS BACK will be given adminship.

Requests for Fanon Administrator

None

Requests for Rollback

None