The forum pages are fully operational! See this link for the latest forum topics, where users can collaborate or discuss certain topics in one place!
Difference between revisions of "Forum:New Bureaucrat election"
Annawantimes (talk | contribs) (new) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
I feel that it is necessary to elect another bureaucrat for Arthur Wiki. LukePhiladelphia is still active, and please do not take this the wrong way Luke, but if you were to go inactive, Arthur Wiki would be left without a Bureaucrat. Customarily wikis have two bureacrats, and I feel that we should do the same. There are three possible candidates, Myself, [[User:THE CJ IS BACK|THE CJ IS BACK]], and [[User:Jacksonian|Jacksonian]]. Despite Luke doing a great job as a bureaucrat, I feel another should be elected. If we feel this is appropriate, we should ask candidates to present their case and have the community vote. What do you guys think? [[User:Annawantimes|'''<span style="color:#000080;" title="My User Page">Annawantimes</span>''']] [[User talk:Annawantimes|'''<small><span style="color:#008080;" title="Soon to be my Wall, Unfortunately">(Talk)</span></small>''']] 23:49, January 10, 2012 (UTC) | I feel that it is necessary to elect another bureaucrat for Arthur Wiki. LukePhiladelphia is still active, and please do not take this the wrong way Luke, but if you were to go inactive, Arthur Wiki would be left without a Bureaucrat. Customarily wikis have two bureacrats, and I feel that we should do the same. There are three possible candidates, Myself, [[User:THE CJ IS BACK|THE CJ IS BACK]], and [[User:Jacksonian|Jacksonian]]. Despite Luke doing a great job as a bureaucrat, I feel another should be elected. If we feel this is appropriate, we should ask candidates to present their case and have the community vote. What do you guys think? [[User:Annawantimes|'''<span style="color:#000080;" title="My User Page">Annawantimes</span>''']] [[User talk:Annawantimes|'''<small><span style="color:#008080;" title="Soon to be my Wall, Unfortunately">(Talk)</span></small>''']] 23:49, January 10, 2012 (UTC) | ||
Why not. <font style="background:#F87A36;">[[User:LukePhiladelphia|'''<font style="color:#231F20;">LukePhiladelphia</font>''']][[User talk:LukePhiladelphia|<sup><small><font style="color:#fff;">Talk</font></small></sup>]]</font> 00:46, January 11, 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:46, 11 January 2012
I feel that it is necessary to elect another bureaucrat for Arthur Wiki. LukePhiladelphia is still active, and please do not take this the wrong way Luke, but if you were to go inactive, Arthur Wiki would be left without a Bureaucrat. Customarily wikis have two bureacrats, and I feel that we should do the same. There are three possible candidates, Myself, THE CJ IS BACK, and Jacksonian. Despite Luke doing a great job as a bureaucrat, I feel another should be elected. If we feel this is appropriate, we should ask candidates to present their case and have the community vote. What do you guys think? Annawantimes (Talk) 23:49, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
Why not. LukePhiladelphiaTalk 00:46, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
