The forum pages are fully operational! See this link for the latest forum topics, where users can collaborate or discuss certain topics in one place!

Editing Forum:Canon

From Arthur Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|Watercooler}}
''This was originally from a blog I made, but this seemed more formal.''
''This was originally from a blog I made, but this seemed more formal.''


Line 6: Line 5:
I know some people would rather bury their heads in the ground (some users on Scoobypedia do) than rather accept this and treat it as one complete continuity, that the Arthur in the original book is the same we're watching in the cartoon, but in reality that just isn't the case. They're doing their own seperate things and they are not in conjuction with each other. Similar to how the Superman you see in one form isn't always the same Superman you see in another. They live in independent worlds, so to speak.
I know some people would rather bury their heads in the ground (some users on Scoobypedia do) than rather accept this and treat it as one complete continuity, that the Arthur in the original book is the same we're watching in the cartoon, but in reality that just isn't the case. They're doing their own seperate things and they are not in conjuction with each other. Similar to how the Superman you see in one form isn't always the same Superman you see in another. They live in independent worlds, so to speak.


So like I said, my proposition is to seperate as much as possible these different continuites of these characters, and those pages can concentrate on those individual subjects. The book characters can focus on the book incarnations and the animated ones can focus on the cartoon incarnations. What I mean specificly is, seperate incarnations for the PBS TV show and the Marc Brown books, etc.. They would also be less of a clutter and trying to make things more cohesive on pages when seperating them would solve that issue altogether. -- [[User:Anythingspossibleforapossible|Anythingspossibleforapossible]] ([[User talk:Anythingspossibleforapossible|talk]]) 15:09, May 29, 2015 (UTC)
So like I said, my proposition is to seperate as much as possible these different continuites of these characters, and those pages can concentrate on those individual subjects. The book characters can focus on the book incarnations and the animated ones can focus on the cartoon incarnations. What I mean specificly is, seperate incarnations for the PBS TV show and the Marc Brown books, etc.. They would also be less of a clutter and trying to make things more cohesive on pages when seperating them would solve that issue altogether.
 
:I've seen how Avatar Wiki and Star Wars Wiki do this. Avatar Wiki has the main canon from its two TV series and comics, then another one for the live-action film. Star Wars Wiki has the new canon as established by Disney, and everything else is "Star Wars Legends" canon. I'll try to combine the two. Avatar is more like what we want, but it should be implemented in a way more like Star Wars. [[:User:5000 Explosions and a Supernova|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman; color:darkgold">5000 Explosions and a Supernova</span>]] ([[User talk:5000 Explosions and a Supernova|talk]]) 01:10, May 30, 2015 (UTC)
 
::It's a good idea, but I think it's worth pointing out that with ''Arthur'' it depends a ''lot'' on the type of book. For example, the chapter books are basically expanded versions of television episodes and should likely be treated pretty much like the television episodes. The same is also true to a large degree for anything that's like an ''[[Arthur's Perfect Christmas (book)|Arthur's Perfect Christmas]]'' or a ''[[D.W.'s Library Card (book)|D.W.'s Library Card]]'' that's adapted from a television episode and not the other way around. And then there's material like a ''[[Good Night, D.W.]]'', which isn't based on anything from the TV show, but looks a lot like what you see on TV and doesn't necessarily contradict anything that you would see on there. 03:50, May 30, 2015 (UTC)

Please note that all contributions to Arthur Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (see Arthur Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: